A typology of critique about higher education teaching
Functional pragmatists, learning theorists, and critical theorists
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14690106 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bruce Macfarlane (0000-0002-9399-6155, Education University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0307-5079 • E-ISSN: 1470-174X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03075079.2025.2536594 |
| OpenAlex | W4413021219 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 61 |
This paper develops a typology for understanding forms of critique about teaching in higher education by drawing on a thematic analysis of papers published in a specialist journal between 1996 and 2023. Based on an analysis of more than 1,000 papers, three broad conceptual categories of critique are identified, labelled as functional pragmatism, learning theory, and critical theory. Functional pragmatism is largely data-driven and concerned with critiquing so-called ‘traditional’ teaching methods. Learning theorists self-identify with particular teaching and learning approaches and methods such as social constructivism, experiential learning, reflexivity, action learning, problem-based learning, and the ‘flipped’ classroom to advocate change while critical theorists advance multi-global perspectives pertaining to equity and social justice including climate change and sustainability, epistemic injustice, southern theory, indigenisation and decolonisation, feminism, social and racial justice, and often critique the effects of neo-liberalism. Over time there has been a shifting balance between these three types of critique with critical theory now in the ascendancy and functional pragmatism in decline. This is indicative of a substantial re-balancing between abstract empiricism and grand theory with researchers shifting from considering ‘what works?’ on the basis of observation, testing and measurement to ‘what is wrong and needs to change?’ by reference to more philosophically and sociologically grounded explanatory frameworks
Critical theory · Critical thinking · Epistemology · Higher education · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Pragmatism · Sociology · Typology · Anthropology · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Philosophy · Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Universities
The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes
Critical thinking in education
Study Skills
Threshold concepts and ‘troublesome’ students
Epistemic decolonisation in reconstituting higher education pedagogy in South Africa
Academic and disciplinary narratives that inhibit teaching for racial justice
Problematising the notion of ‘the excellent teacher’
The climate crisis as a driver for pedagogical renewal in higher education
Barriers to student active learning in higher education
Racial disparities in student outcomes in British higher education
Exploring online readiness in the context of the Covid 19 pandemic
Getting critical about critique in higher education
What do we mean by ‘pedagogy’ in sustainability education
Six critical questions for teaching justice-based environmental sustainability (JBES) in higher education
The 'Postmodern Turn' in the Social Sciences
Limitations of Co-Citation Analysis as a Tool for Science Policy
The Sociological Imagination
Teaching critical reflection
Understanding 'teaching excellence' in higher education
Critique, Dissent, Disciplinarity
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |