Sovereigns, Spooks, and Hackers
An Early History of Google Geo Services and Map Mashups
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 14701296 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Craig M Dalton (0000-0001-6208-1043, Department of Environmental, Geographical, and Geological Sciences / Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania / Bloomsburg / PA / USA, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 261-274 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0317-7173 • E-ISSN: 1911-9925 |
| Editora | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/carto.48.4.1621 |
| OpenAlex | W2009885196 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 14 |
| Referências citadas | 39 |
Google geo services, such as Google Maps and Google Earth, offer popular and powerful geographic ways of seeing the world. This is a social history of the cartographic visions at work in Google geo services and related geoweb applications/map mashups. These geographic technologies are the result of shifting configurations of power that include state programs, private corporations, and small-scale tinkerer/hackers. Through these shifts, two particular geographic ways of seeing develop and come together: multi-scalar hyperlocal views and aerial imagery. These visual geographic knowledges were used together for military purposes during the Cold War and combined using 1990s video game software. Google popularized hyperlocal and aerial imagery ways of seeing by applying them in its targeted advertising-based business strategy. Hackers re-engineered Google Maps to create map mashups (geoweb applications), and Google executives chose to incorporate those applications into the company's strategy. Constructing this conditional history with its changing knowledges and variety of actors indicates how sovereign power and, later, capitalism had fundamental roles in forging ways of seeing with maps on the Web. Google's maps today have their own limits. They are highly individualized and often consumption-oriented but may prompt new kinds of mappings in the future
Computer security · Data science · Hacker · Mashup · The Internet · Web 2.0 · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Web Data Mining and Analysis
Mapping Mashups
Branding the Geospatial Industry
The free labor of “local guides”
Google gazes and digital seams
Geographic Representation in GIS and Art
Failed hybrids
The semiotics of digital cartography at the Geoguessr interface
Street-level
Powering the local review engine at Yelp and Google
Performing the sharing economy
Territorial Conflict in the Digital Age
For fun and profit
Critical Data Studies
Inflated granularity
Coding Freedom
Apollo's Eye
The Nuclear Borderlands
NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise
Discipline and Punish
Social formation and symbolic landscape
Geographical imaginations
Lie Of The Land
A Political Economic Critique of Google Maps and Google Earth
Inventing accuracy
Cartography Without Progress
Just Maps
The credibility of volunteered geographic information
Citizens as sensors
Volunteered geographic information
Situating the geoweb in political economy
The social construction of scale
Progress in Human Geography
Imaging the World in a Barrel
Photography and Flight
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women
Watching the Bombs Go Off
Monarchs, Ministers, and Maps
The Geographical Imagination in America, 1880-1950
The ‘view from nowhere’? Spatial politics and cultural significance of high-resolution satellite imagery
The creative reconstruction of the Internet
Walter Benjamin’s Dionysian Adventures on Google Earth
Researching Volunteered Geographic Information
Human geography without scale
The Geographical Imagination in America, 1880-1950
Neogeography and the Delusion of Democratisation
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,27 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 14 |