Art, Science, and Power in Sixteenth-Century Dutch Cartography

Bibliographic Data

ID14701979
AuthorsJ B Harley (University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, United States and General State Archives, The Hague, Netherlands, corresponding author), Kees Zandvliet
Year1992
Volume29
Issue2
Pages10-19
Publication date1992-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0317-7173 • E-ISSN: 1911-9925
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/0n38-lmv8-21l5-0366
OpenAlexW1999318104
LanguageEN
Citations received16

The history of Dutch cartography in the sixteenth century is often explained in terms of the opposition between cartography as Art and cartography as Science. It is our contention that this polarization is flawed, based as it is an artificial divide fully established only in the nineteenth century. Between these extremes lies a conceptual vacuum which hides the ideological meaning of the map. Our alternative is to see maps as a form of power-knowledge. Cartography, like painting, is the record of a subjective domain. Map-makers classify and select knowledge to be presented or to be omitted; they state their own involvement in a complex world. Our contention is that maps can also become active agents, helping to impose a reality they pretend merely to mirror

Art history · Cartography · Epistemology · Geography · Ideology · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Financial Crisis of the 21st Century · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Historical Geography and Cartography · History · Law · Philosophy