Interactivity and Cartography
A Contemporary Perspective on User Interface and User Experience Design from Geospatial Professionals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14702177 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert E Roth (0000-0003-1241-318X, University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 94-115 |
| Publication date | 2015-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0317-7173 • E-ISSN: 1911-9925 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/cart.50.2.2427 |
| OpenAlex | W564352722 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 62 |
This article reports on a semi-structured interview study with 21 geospatial professionals to provide a contemporary snapshot of expert opinion on the design and use of interactive maps and map-based systems (treated together as “cartographic interfaces”). Interview questions were based on key themes regarding interaction discussed within cartography and across the related fields of human-computer interaction, information visualization, usability engineering, and visual analytics, enabling a comparison of the current states of science and practice regarding user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) design in cartography. The results are organized according to five broad topics germane to UI/UX design in cartography: (1) the meaning of cartographic interaction in both research and practice (what?), (2) the purpose of cartographic interaction and the value it provides (why?), (3) the times when interaction positively supports work/play and therefore should be provided (when?), (4) the way in which user differences impact the success of the cartographic interaction (who?), and (5) the opportunities for or limitations on cartographic interaction imposed by the computing device supporting the interaction (where?). The interview study is significant for two reasons: first, it charts current trends in interactive mapping from the perspective of expert professionals, a population often missed in quantitative cartographic scholarship, and, second, it enables a reflection on future trends in UI/UX design in cartography, both those resulting from existing gaps between science and practice and those arising from emerging conceptual and technological developments
Cartography · Data science · Geography · Geospatial analysis · Geovisualization · Human–computer interaction · Information visualization · Interaction Design · Interactivity · Perspective (graphical · Usability · User experience design · User interface · Visualization · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Data Management and Algorithms · Data Visualization and Analytics · Geographic Information Systems Studies
Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group Data
Informing geospatial toolset design
A Qualitative Evaluation of MapTime, A Program For Exploring Spatiotemporal Point Data
Going Viral
A Pattern Identification Approach to Cartographic Visualization
Evaluating the Usability of a Tool for Visualizing the Uncertainty of the Future Global Water Balance
Research Challenges in Geovisualization
Cognitive Map-Design Research in the Twentieth Century
Developing a Geographic Visualization Tool to Support Earth Science Learning
A Qualitative Approach to Understanding the Role of Geographic Information Uncertainty during Decision Making
The Impact of User Expertise on Geographic Risk Assessment under Uncertain Conditions
Combining Usability Techniques to Design Geovisualization Tools for Epidemiology
Geospatial Information Visualization User Interface Issues
Citizens as sensors
Volunteered geographic information
Location-based services, conspicuous mobility, and the location-aware future
Sex-Related Differences and Similarities in Geographic and Environmental Spatial Abilities
Qualitative Data Analysis
The Look of Maps
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.56 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |