"In Defence of "Belief
A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14713588 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan A Lanman (0000-0002-4691-5922, University of Oxford, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 49-62 |
| Publication date | 2008-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0353-1589 • E-ISSN: 2334-8801 |
| Publisher | University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy - Department of Ethnology and Anthropology (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.21301/eap.v3i3.3 |
| OpenAlex | W2612915235 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
The cognitive science of religion seeks to explain religious beliefs. Yet "belief" as a term has been criticised by many anthropologists, psychologists, and philosophers. The main criticisms of "belief" are that beliefs are unobservable, that they do not exist, and that the word ‘belief’ is a western construct unsuitable for comparative use. All of these criticisms may seem to render a "science of belief" naïve and mistaken. Utilizing the work of the cognitive sciences, and the philosophical view of functionalism that underlies them, I will offer a minimal definition of belief that will allow for a science of belief and withstand such criticisms
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Philosophy · Study and Philosophy of Religion
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.21 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |