Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Could We Trust Parents? Bioethical Analysis of Biomedical Intervention on Healthy Children

Bibliographic Data

ID14713841
AuthorsVeselin Mitrović (0000-0001-5783-2164, Institute of Social Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume18
Issue4
Publication date2024-01-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEtnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0353-1589 • E-ISSN: 2334-8801
PublisherUniversity of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy - Department of Ethnology and Anthropology (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.21301/eap.v18i4.6
OpenAlexW4390574045
LanguageEN
References cited1

This text deals with the bioethical analysis of biotechnologies and biomedical interventions for healthy children to achieve a better life for them. The study of such a situation requires that the relationship between respect for autonomy and beneficence should be considered from two perspectives: first, from the perspective of parents as holders of the right to make decisions about the treatment and improvement of their minor children (the principle of respect for autonomy). In that case, parents are guided by the principle of benevolence and paternalistically demand interventions with new bio-medical technologies to make their children's lives better, that is, to improve them. Another approach to the same problem refers to the pressure of children on their parents to provide them with a better life through medical interventions that are increasingly imposed as a social, gender, and aesthetic demand and promoted as an exit of "social suffering," to which individuals who do not meet such requirements are exposed. Bearing in mind both aspects, we analyze the possibility of solving emerging social problems through the potential transfer of the principle of autonomy (owned by parents) to the creditors of the right to make decisions regarding medical interventions for healthy children. Such concerns become particularly relevant given the complexity of the old question: Do parents see their children as an extension of their motives and ambitions? In that case, instead of the decision of the children and the family, an active role in deciding on the implementation of the interventions above should be played by independent professional and ethical commissions, which assess whether the holders of the right to make decisions aim to treat or improve healthy children and that these interventions would be possibly more adequate before some invasive application of biotechnological means

Autonomy · Beneficence · Best interests · Bioethics · Intervention (counseling · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Computer Science · Ethics and bioethics in healthcare · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Identity and the new eugenics in the Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act

    Open Access•Shoshana Magnet•Media Culture & Society•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae