Jeffrey Stout on Democracy and Its Contemporary Christian Critics

Jeffrey Stout addresses two of the main criticisms of liberal democracy by its contemporary neotraditionalist Christian critics: that liberal democracy is destructive of social tradition, and thereby of virtue in the citizenry, and that liberal democracy is inherently secular, committed to expunging religious voices from the public arena. I judge that Stout effectively answers these charges: liberal democracy has its own tradition, it cultivates the virtues relevant to that, and it is not inherently hostile to piety. What Stout does not do, I suggest, is take the next step of showing, positively, that Christianity can and should affirm the substance of liberal democratic society. This is due, in good measure, to the fact that Stout never tells us, except in off‐hand comments, what he takes the substance of liberal democracy to be. And this, in turn, is due to his way of employing pragmatism: he uses pragmatism to give an account of human society generally, not of liberal democratic society. I raise some questions about the general account that pragmatism gives of human society, and thus about the account that it would give of liberal democracy

Democracy · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Liberalism · Political science · Politics · Pragmatism · Sociology · Virtue · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Religion and Society Interactions

• On Behalf of Rights

  Open Access•David Little•Journal of Religious Ethics•2006

  Add to list

• Introduction Conversations With Jeffrey Stout on Democracy and Tradition

  Open Access•C H B Reynolds, Charles H Reynolds•Journal of Religious Ethics•2005

  Add to list

• Democracy and Tradition

  Jeffrey Stout, Jeffrey R Stout•Democracy and Tradition•2009

  Add to list