Muslim Governance and the Duty to Protect
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14760527 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Irene Oh (0000-0003-2295-6030, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 15-19 |
| Publication date | 2013-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Religious Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0384-9694 • E-ISSN: 1467-9795 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jore.12001 |
| OpenAlex | W1481764888 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
In this response to J ohnson, O h reaffirms the scholarly vision of K elsay and T wiss, elaborates upon M uslim perspectives on human rights, and questions the emphasis on violent humanitarian interventions as part of the Responsibility to Protect mandate. O h suggests that, in light of the historical relationship between M uslim and non‐ M uslim states and the aftermath of the second I raq W ar, more consideration be given to the rebuilding of M uslim‐majority societies. O h also highlights the concept of duty as a religiously based ideal to which governments of M uslim nations ought to be held
Business · Corporate governance · Duty · Environmental ethics · Human rights · Ideal (ethics · Mandate · Political science · Responsibility to Protect · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy · Public Administration · Religion, Society, and Development
| Highly cited | No |
|---|