Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dispenser of the Mercy of the Government

Pardons, Justice, and Felony Disenfranchisement

Bibliographic Data

ID14760568
AuthorsJonathan Rothchild (Loyola Marymount University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume39
Issue1
Pages48-70
Publication date2011-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Religious Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0384-9694 • E-ISSN: 1467-9795
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00465.x
OpenAlexW1560251360
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited16

I argue that the aporetic character of clemency must be understood in terms of its unmerited and merited character to achieve the underlying purposes of justice within criminal justice: justice as fairness (punishment must be deserved and proportionate) and justice as restoration (repair of the harm to victims and society and the reintegration of offenders) are paramount goals. Rather than destabilizing political order, pardons can render productive potential tensions between justice as fairness and justice as restoration. Taking as my conceptual point of departure Paul Ricoeur's claims about the suprajuridical and supraethical character of pardon, I develop the argument through three central sections: an excursus into historical and contemporary practices of clemency in the United States; a critical analysis of the merited and unmerited aspects of clemency with respect to remorse and atonement theories within theological and legal discourse; and a normative engagement with pardons and felony disenfranchisement

Argument (complex analysis · Atonement · Character (mathematics · Criminology · Economic Justice · Government (linguistics · Harm · Normative · Political science · Politics · Punishment (psychology · Remorse · Restorative justice · Retributive justice · Sociology · Theology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • La privación de derecho a sufragio como castigo en la órbita del common law

    Open Access•Pablo Marshall, Pablo Marshall Barberán•Política criminal•2019

  • Guilt and Shame, Justice and Mercy

    Open Access•Jonathan Rothchild•Journal of Religious Ethics•2020

  • Experiencing Justice from the Inside Out

    Open Access•Jason S Sexton•Religions•2019

  • Responsibility and Atonement

    Richard Swinburne•Responsibility and atonement•1989

  • Memory, History, Forgetting

    Paul Ricoeur, Kathleen Blamey et al.•Memory, History, Forgetting•2004

  • The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals.

    Noah Porter•Kant's Ethics: A critical…•2010

  • Truth Commissions and Judicial Trials

    Donald W Shriver•Journal of Law and Religion•2001

  • The Death Penalty

    Stuart Banner•Death Penalty•2002

  • The Prison and the Gallows

    Open Access•Marie Gottschalk•Prison and the Gallows•2001

  • The Law

    Open Access•Louis Fisher•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2002

  • The Founders' Constitution

    Paul Finkelman, Philip B Kurland et al.•Journal of the Early Republic•1987

  • Justification and Justice in a Theology of Grace

    Open Access•Kathryn Tanner•Theology Today•1999

  • The Political Roots of Executive Clemency

    Open Access•Andrew B Whitford, Holona L Ochs et al.•American Politics Research•2006

  • At the Boundaries of Law

    Open Access•Austin Sarat•American Quarterly•2005

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,43
Citation span2019 - 2020 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae