Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Legal pluralism and the convention on the transfer of sentenced persons in practice

Highlighting the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the transfer of sentenced persons within and to Europe

Bibliographic Data

ID14799740
AuthorsJamil Ddamulira Mujuzi (0000-0003-1370-6718, University of the Western Cape, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume47
Issue2
Pages324-346
Publication date2015-05-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0732-9113 • E-ISSN: 2305-9931
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07329113.2015.1027555
OpenAlexW2271740552
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

Many European countries have hundreds of foreign national offenders in their prisons. Foreign national offenders face different problems in prisons; hence, the need for their transfer to their countries of nationality to serve their sentences. All member states of the European Union are states parties to the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons, which was replaced by Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA. However, it is still applicable to the transfer of offenders between some European countries and also between European countries and countries outside Europe. The European Court of Human Rights has developed jurisprudence dealing with the rights of offenders who have been transferred on the basis of the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons. This jurisprudence shows, inter alia, that before an offender is transferred to serve his sentence, the authorities in the sentencing state have to consider not only their penal laws but also those of the enforcing state – hence legal pluralism. The purpose of this article is to highlight the human rights issues that the Court has dealt with under the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons. Due to the fact that the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons has been ratified by countries in Europe and outside Europe, the jurisprudence discussed below is relevant to countries from different parts of the world

Business · Convention · European union · Human rights · Immigration · Jurisprudence · Nationality · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

  • Decoding legal pluralism in Africa

    Berihun Adugna Gebeye•The Journal of Legal Pluralism…•2017

  • Immigration Detention and Human Rights

    Galina Cornelisse, G N Cornelisse•Immigration detention and human…•2010

  • Inside Immigration Detention

    Mary Bosworth•Inside Immigration Detention•2014

  • Sentencing and Punishment

    Susan M Easton, Sue Easton et al.•Sentencing and punishment•2012

  • Security, Insecurity and Migration in Europe

    Gabriella Lazaridis•Security, Insecurity and…•2016

  • Immigration Detention

    Steve Peers•International Journal of Refugee…•2013

  • Security, Insecurity and Migration in Europe

    Johanna Schuster‐Craig•Journal of Contemporary European…•2012

  • Irregular Migration in Europe

    Jarmila Rajas•Journal of Contemporary European…•2012

  • Migration and global environmental change

    Open Access•Richard Black, W Neil Adger et al.•Global Environmental Change•2011

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,11
Citation span2017 - 2017 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae