Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The jurisprudence of responsive mediation

An empirical examination of Chinese people's mediation in action

Bibliographic Data

ID14799823
AuthorsShahla Ali, Shahla F Ali (0000-0001-8688-158X, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume45
Issue2
Pages227-248
Publication date2013-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0732-9113 • E-ISSN: 2305-9931
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07329113.2013.796759
OpenAlexW2145962074
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

Community mediation in China has a long history and finds its roots in both cultural (traditional Confucian ideologies) and functional (the avoidance of social conflicts) aims. Recently, however, owing to changes in societal values occurring alongside China's economic open-door policy, traditional values are losing their prominent role in the mediation process. Meanwhile, reforms are being carried out to provide greater structure to community mediation in China. The combination of these changes has resulted in struggles to redefine the place and role of mediation in China. While the flexibility and responsiveness of mediation allows a contextualized and ‘learning mode of legal intervention’, it is at risk of being a ‘precarious ideal’ that lacks precision. Nevertheless, empirical research shows that a new version of mediation which is embedded in the ‘rule of law’ is emerging and that responses from mediators in relation to this new mode of mediation are positive, reporting enhancement in both objectivity and legitimacy. This paper seeks to explore the unique challenges and opportunities of achieving responsive mediation in action in China. Drawing on a set of interviews and a case study conducted in three cities in China, the paper aims to contribute to the legal pluralism discourse by examining how mediation in China, traditionally an ‘unofficial’ form of legal practice is now becoming ‘official’ through state sanction and how mediators interact with traditional Confucian normative orders in the context of changing social priorities and values. This paper is divided into three parts: Part I discusses briefly the jurisprudence of responsive law; Part II examines contemporary mediation policy in China which echoes in many respects the goals and challenges of responsive law and Part III provides an empirical exploration of the challenges of applying responsive law ideals in practice

Alternative dispute resolution · China · Empirical research · Epistemology · Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Legal pluralism · Legal profession · Legal realism · Legitimacy · Mediation · Party-directed mediation · Political science · Politics · Rule of law · Sociology · Transformative mediation · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Dispute Resolution and Class Actions · Law

  • Collective forests and the community at the legal frontier of property rights reforms in China

    Pingyang Liu, Neil Ravenscroft•The Journal of Legal Pluralism…•2021

  • From “Access to Justice” to “Barrier to Justice”? An Empirical Examination of Chinese Court-Annexed Mediation

    Open Access•Yedan LI•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2016

  • Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law

    Robert H Mnookin, Lewis A Kornhauser et al.•The Yale Law Journal•1979

  • Mao and Mediation

    Stanley Lubman•California Law Review•1967

  • Everyday Forms of Violence

    M G Wiber•The Journal of Legal Pluralism…•1995

  • What is Legal Pluralism

    Jacob Griffiths, John Griffiths•The Journal of Legal Pluralism…•1986

  • Really Responsive Regulation

    Open Access•Richard Baldwin, Robert Baldwin et al.•Modern Law Review•2008

  • Law After the Welfare State

    Peer Zumbansen•The American Journal of…•2008

  • Legal Pluralism

    Open Access•Sally Engle Merry•Law & Society Review•1988

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2016 - 2021 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae