Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

After Marshall

Implementation of Aboriginal Fishing Rights in Atlantic Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID14799863
AuthorsM G Wiber (0000-0002-6764-0067, corresponding author), Melanie Wiber, Chris Milley
Year2007
Volume39
Issue55
Pages163-186
Publication date2007-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0732-9113 • E-ISSN: 2305-9931
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07329113.2007.10756611
OpenAlexW2322860346
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited6

Both the Canadian Constitution and several Supreme Court decisions have guaranteed Canada's First Nations special rights to natural resources including lands, waters, and fisheries. In acting on these rights, however, aboriginal peoples of Canada not been successful in arguing that their activities should be guided by the objectives, rules and protocols established by their First Nation, and not by those of the post-colonial Government of Canada. More recently, the 1999 Marshall decision of the Supreme Court of Canada recognized the Treaty Right of the Mi'kmaq, Maliseet and Passamaquoddy peoples to rely on natural resources for a 'moderate livelihood' and a 'communal level of benefit'. While this decision was met with uncertainly and some hostility by the non-native population, it did result in the government offering new program support to First Nations communities engaged in the commercial fishery in the Canadian Maritimes. This paper assesses those programs and provides an analysis of what First Nation communities have lost and gained in the process

Colonialism · Constitution · First nation · Fishing · Geography · Government (linguistics · Indigenous · Livelihood · Natural resource · Political science · Population · Sociology · Supreme court · Treaty · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Public Administration · Ecology

  • Distribution of fishery benefits and community well-being

    Open Access•Kevin Squires, M G Wiber•Conservation Ecology•2018

  • Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries

    Open Access•Nicolás L Gutiérrez, Ray Hilborn et al.•Nature•2011

  • A Mi’kmaw Perspective on Advancing Salmon Governance in Nova Scotia, Canada

    Open Access•Shelley Denny, Lucia Fanning•International Indigenous Policy…•2016

  • Bridging Parallel Rows

    Open Access•Nicole Latulippe•International Indigenous Policy…•2015

  • Emergence and Progression of Acadian Ethnic and Political Identities

    Open Access•Katie K Macleod•The University of Western Ontario…•2015

  • Legal pluralism in aquatic regimes

    Open Access•Maarten Bavinck, Jagdish Gupta•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2014

  • Legal Pluralism and the Governability of Fisheries and Coastal Systems

    Jentoft, Svein Jentoft•The Journal of Legal Pluralism…•2011

  • Assimilation and Partition

    Shiri Pasternak•South Atlantic Quarterly•2020

  • Situating the Work

    Open Access•Nicole Latulippe•AlterNative An International…•2015

  • Fishing Rights as an Example of the Economic Rhetoric of Privatization

    Open Access•M G Wiber•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2000

  • Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources

    Edella Schlager, Elinor Ostrom et al.•Land Economics•1992

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,6
Citation span2011 - 2020 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae