Epistemological differences in the discussion of the interpersonal theory of suicide
A reply to the response
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14809259 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Heidi Hjelmeland (0000-0003-4745-4301, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Birthe Loa Knizek (0000-0002-5952-9895, Norwegian University of Science and Technology) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 163-165 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-07 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Death Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0748-1187 • E-ISSN: 1091-7683 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07481187.2019.1614112 |
| PMID | 31074364 |
| OpenAlex | W2944473452 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 10 |
This paper is a reply to Smith and colleagues' response to our critique of the interpersonal theory of suicide (IPTS). They believe that we mischaracterize and misinterpret aspects of the IPTS. Here, we argue that the problem rather seems to be that we are discussing the IPTS from two different epistemological "planets."
Epistemology · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal violence · Medical emergency · Poison control · Suicide prevention · Medicine · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments · Social Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |