Comparing Two SEARCC Member Codes of Ethics
ACS and SCS
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14823188 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shirley Wheeler (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 99-117 |
| Publication date | 2004-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Manusya Journal of Humanities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0859-9920 • E-ISSN: 2665-9077 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/26659077-00704007 |
| OpenAlex | W2947925718 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
The South East Asian Regional Computer Confederation (SEARCC) Code of Ethics provides standards for its members, and this includes the establishment of a congruent code of conduct for each member organization. The degree to which the Australian and Singaporean professional codes of ethics and conduct are reflective of the SEARCC Code of Ethics will be examined in this paper. A new systemic approach to applied ethics will be used for this exercise. Points of comparison and contrast between the two Member codes will be considered. Some implications for more global compatibility in IS-related codes of ethics are drawn
Applied ethics · Engineering ethics · Ethical code · Information ethics · Meta-ethics · Political science · Professional Conduct · Professional ethics · Programming language · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics in Business and Education · Information and Cyber Security · Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|