Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Falsifications as a source of myth-making in the historiography of Baron R.F. Ungern

Bibliographic Data

ID14824911
AuthorsL Kuzmin (0000-0001-9544-1359, Russian Academy of Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2023
Issue3
Pages213
Publication date2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueVostok Afro-Aziatskie obshchestva istoriia i sovremennost (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0869-1908 • E-ISSN: 2713-0401
PublisherInstitute of Oriental Studies Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.31857/s086919080025187-2
OpenAlexW4388052147
LanguageEN

The article discusses different kinds of falsifications of documents, memoirs and artifacts as one of the sources of making mythologized narratives on the life and activity of Baron R.F. von Ungern-Sternberg (1886–1921), one of well-known warlords during the Civil War in Russia, who restored the independence of Outer Mongolia in the year 1921. Falsifications and hyperbolizations of events became important factors influencing the development of the historiography of Ungern. The most important cause of these falsifications and hyperbolizations was ideologization. Ideological and propagandistic clichés were broadly used by both sides, “red” and “white”, of the confrontation during the Civil War in Russia and the Bolsheviks-aided revolution of 1921 in Mongolia. Studies of documents, memoirs, mass media, scientific and popular publications revealed that these more or less similar labels were introduced into historical discourse mainly as a result of multiyear repetitions of the same ideological clichés. Examples of different kinds of falsifications are given. A number of items of phaleristics connected with the Asiatic Cavalry Division, commanded by R.F. Ungern, are the objects made after this division ceased to exist. Some texts claimed to be documents, related and/or written by R.F. Ungern, which were published in scientific journals, were demonstrated to be fakes. Some of these materials, indicated as documents from Russian state archives, were found to be really absent from these archives. It is concluded that the fact of publication of a document does not mean its authenticity. In some cases a document's published version may also contain falsifications

Archaeology · Art · Cliché · Historiography · Ideology · Literature · Memoir · Mythology · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Spanish Civil War · Classics · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law · Philosophy, History, and Historiography · Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae