The New Theory of the Perpetrator and the Duties of the Psychiatrical Expert
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14829136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | W Eliasberg (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1939 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 498 |
| Publication date | 1939-11-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951 (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0885-2731 • E-ISSN: 2160-0015 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1136972 |
| OpenAlex | W369171297 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
There are very good reasons in favor of the principle that crim-inal law must not take into consideration anything but the real facts of the case; the real aim is however to reform the culprit's position within criminal law. Casting a retrospective glance at how the problem of the culprit has been treated during the last fifty years we are able to distinguish two phases; a positivistic and a non-positivistic one. The final aim of criminological positivism is to find the reasons why a certain person committed a certain crime on a certain place, at a certain time. This question is parallel to the problem of the Laplace formula of the Universe. Positivists regard all individual fields of science (e.g., Criminal Statistics, Criminal Biology, Crim-inal Psychopathology, the Art of Deduction, the isolated analysis of certain phenomena, like Graphology) as components of a mosaic picture which will reveal the connection-viz, the causal interrela
Criminology · Computer Science · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Free Will and Agency · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
| Highly cited | No |
|---|