"You Do Solemnly Swear!" or That Perjury Problem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14829912 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harry Hibschman (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1934 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 901 |
| Publication date | 1934-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951 (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0885-2731 • E-ISSN: 2160-0015 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1135015 |
| OpenAlex | W144872665 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
I asserted the other day in a public address that there was perjury in fifty per cent of all contested civil cases, in seventy-five per cent of all criminal cases, and in ninety per cent of all divorce cases; and the audience laughed!So notorious is false swearing in court proceedings that an intelligent group of American citizens looks upon it as a joke.And yet it must be obvious that if the stream of fact in a judicial proceeding is polluted, the stream of justice will also be impure.The present prevalence of perjury is not a joke but a tragedy.The problem, however, is not a new one.Throughout history wherever oaths have been required either by custom or by law, perjury has been scandalously common.Formerly the means relied upon to cope with the problem were supernatural.The object of the oath was to frighten the witness into telling the truth lest he suffer under the hand of an outraged Deity.We .stillprofess to believe, by the very fact that we retain the oath, that it has a supernatural sanction; but at the same time we make perjury a crime and threaten the oath-taker with dire secular penalties if he bears false witness.In addition the courts have the power to punish false swearers for contempt of court and occasionally do so.Neither lawyers nor judges, however, put their faith in the efficacy of the oath as a truth-compelling instrument.They persist in believing that one good piece of cross-examination is worth more than half a dozen oaths.When it comes to dealing with an evasive or dishonest witness one Max Steuer outweighs all the oaths ever invented.Clearly, then, the oath itself with whatever power is inherent in it, the penal law, and the power of the courts to punish for contempt have up to the present been impotent to prevent perjury and to force witnesses to tell the truth in court; and, if for the moment we can cast aside our indifference to such an appalling condition, it is certainly pertinent to acquire whether we are wholly helpless or whether, on the other hand, there is a way of coping with the mo-iThe author is a member of the bar of the State of Washington
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Medicine · Torture, Ethics, and Law
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |