Development process, clinical utility, and preliminary psychometric evidence of a new tool for screening psychological distress in renal care settings
The Hemodialysis Distress Thermometer (HD-DT)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14832869 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helena Sousa (0000-0002-8101-0010, CINTESIS@RISE, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, corresponding author), Oscar Ribeiro (0000-0001-7396-639X, CINTESIS@RISE, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro), Débora Figueiredo (0000-0002-3160-7871, CINTESIS@RISE, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 1658-1684 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychology & Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0887-0446 • E-ISSN: 1476-8321 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08870446.2024.2347662 |
| PMID | 38679920 |
| OpenAlex | W4396223750 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 66 |
Objective This study aimed to develop, evaluate the clinical utility, and test the psychometric properties of a new tool – the Hemodialysis Distress Thermometer (HD-DT) – designed to screen self-reported psychological distress and its sources in adults receiving hemodialysis.Methods and Measures Phase 1 focused on the process of developing and evaluating the content validity and clinical utility of the HD-DT using a stepwise mixed-methods approach; in Phase 2, the measurement properties of the European Portuguese version of the HD-DT were tested against reference measures in a cross-sectional study (n = 134 people on hemodialysis); while in Phase 3 the HD-DT was translated and culturally adapted into American English using forward-backward translation and review by a panel of experts.Results Qualitative findings suggested that the HD-DT was perceived by feedback panels as practical and useful for rapidly screening psychological distress in nephrology centers. The European Portuguese version of this new tool showed good test-retest reliability and high diagnostic accuracy using a cutoff point of ≥ 6 for total distress. High convergent validity was found with reference measures that assess psychological health, and symptoms of anxiety and depression.Conclusion This study highlights the potential clinical utility of the HD-DT as an acceptable, reliable, and valid measure that can be used by health psychologists in clinical practice and research in renal care settings. Data collection to validate the American English version of the HD-DT is currently underway
Distress · Hemodialysis · Mental health · Psychiatry · Psychological distress · Psychotherapist · Cardiac Health and Mental Health · Clinical Psychology · Dialysis and Renal Disease Management · Family Caregiving in Mental Illness · Psychology
Mental Illnesses - Understanding, Prediction and Control
Validation study of a Portuguese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Estimation of the Youden Index and its Associated Cutoff Point
Psychological distress
Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
Index Construction with Formative Indicators
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
The content validity index
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019
Disentangling between- and within-person associations of psychological distress and mental well-being
Cosmin Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
The Hemodialysis Distress Thermometer for Caregivers (HD-DT-C)
Assessing test–retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures using intraclass correlation coefficients
An exploration of successful psychosocial adjustment to long-term in-centre haemodialysis
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |