A Review Essay
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14833008 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jacquelyn N Zita (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 157-168 |
| Publication date | 1988-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Hypatia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0887-5367 • E-ISSN: 1527-2001 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00061.x |
| OpenAlex | W3193172106 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 10 |
This essay is a critical review of Sandra Harding's The Science Question in Feminism . Her text constitutes a monumental effort to capture an overview of recent feminist critique of science and to develop a feminist dialectical and materialist conception of the history of masculinist science. In this analysis of Harding's work, the organizing categories as well as the main assumptions of the text are reconstructed for closer examination within the context of modern feminist critique of science and feminist theory in general. Although a postive review of Harding's text is presented, questions are raised concerning the adequacy of socialist feminist assumptions for such a project, the limitations of Harding's theorization of gender, and the appropriateness of “postmodernism” as a final category of residence
Dialectic · Epistemology · Feminism · Materialism · Postmodernism · Sociology · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Philosophy · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
The Prism of sex
The science question in feminism
Intellectual and Manual Labour
Translated by Carol Mastrangelo Bové
The Method Question
Discovering Reality
Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State
Hand, Brain, and Heart
Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence
Women's Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1989 - 2004 (16) |
| Highly cited | No |