Tibetan Identity and the Cultural Consensus Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14834179 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amy Mountcastle (SUNY College, Plattsburgh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 6-11 |
| Publication date | 2008-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Practicing Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0888-4552 • E-ISSN: 2994-1628 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17730/praa.30.1.h54202175n726822 |
| OpenAlex | W2020071250 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Anthropologists have typically been polarized in their preferred methods of data collection and analysis. Quantitative research is characterized by its detractors as being reductionistic and positivist, while qualitative research is viewed as being non-scientific because of issues of reliability and validity. In the Survey Methods course at SCRM, participants were primarily from qualitative backgrounds. It quickly became apparent that we represented a small, but perhaps growing, subgroup of ethnographic researchers who are interested, for a variety of reasons, in bridging this qual-quant divide
Aesthetics · Data collection · Epistemology · Ethnography · Positivism · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Reductionism · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Computer Science · Cultural Differences and Values · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Artificial Intelligence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |