Redefining Relationships
American Indians and National Parks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14834726 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Ruppert (0000-0002-6713-2257) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 10-13 |
| Publication date | 1994-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Practicing Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0888-4552 • E-ISSN: 2994-1628 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17730/praa.16.3.p181025g77083722 |
| OpenAlex | W2031941926 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
What are now federal lands and resources have been for centuries part of the cultural heritage of American Indian tribal communities. Management of these lands and resources, as well as relationships between agencies and tribes, should reflect this fact. In the past, these processes have been characterized by one-way communication, dominant-subordinate relations, and the imposition of non-Indian methods of interaction. Today, growing tribal political awareness and resulting legislation dealing with American Indian relationships to natural resources are forcing federal agencies to redefine their relationships with American Indian peoples
Cultural heritage · Ethnology · Geography · Legislation · Native american · Natural resource · Political science · Politics · Sociology · American Environmental and Regional History · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1999 - 1999 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |