Values Mapping with Latino Forest Users
Contributing to the Dialogue on Multiple Land Use Conflict Management
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14835228 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kelly Biedenweg (0000-0002-9230-1315, Natural Capital Project, Stanford’s Woods Institute for the Environment, Lead Social Scientist), Lee Cerveny (United States Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Seattle, Washington), R Mclain (0000-0001-6501-2190, Institute for Sustainable Solutions, Portland State University) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 33-37 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Practicing Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0888-4552 • E-ISSN: 2994-1628 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17730/praa.36.1.3j78673527m17u26 |
| OpenAlex | W2510913925 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
Values mapping that represents how humans associate with natural environments is useful for several purposes, including recognizing and addressing different perceptions of natural resource ownership and management priorities, documenting traditional ecological knowledge, and spatially identifying the public's perception of economic and non-economic services provided by natural resources (McLain et al. 2013). The majority of this work has been conducted in developing countries and with disenfranchised communities, where participatory mapping associated with natural resource management is more widely practiced. As access to GIS technology has expanded, however, several projects have tested the benefits of values mapping for natural resource management decisions in industrialized countries (e.g., Brown 2005; Klain and Chan 2012). This article discusses one such effort: the use of spatial values mapping to incorporate the concerns of Latino forest users into federal and state policies on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State
Business · Citizen journalism · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land use · Natural resource · Natural resource management · Political science · Resource (disambiguation · Resource management (computing · Work (physics · Computer Science · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation · Ecology
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2017 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |