Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Law Review Approach

What the Humanities Can Learn

Bibliographic Data

ID14856324
AuthorsAllen Mendenhall (0009-0001-4549-613X, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume26
Issue1
Pages48-58
Publication date2013-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAcademic Questions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0895-4852 • E-ISSN: 1936-4709
PublisherNational Association of Scholars (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1007/s12129-013-9341-z
OpenAlexW2156686168
LanguageEN

Readers of this journal probably know how the peer review process works in the humanities disciplines and at various journals, so I will explain how the law review process generally works and then what the humanities can learn and borrow from the law review process. I will end by advocating for a hybrid law review/peer review approach to publishing. The law review process is not a panacea for our publishing ills. It has several drawbacks and shortcomings. This essay highlights the positives and notes some of the negatives of the law review publishing process, but a lengthy explanation of all that is good or bad about law reviews is not my aim. Every law review has its idiosyncrasies and methodologies, but most share certain overarching procedures and protocols that can be evaluated in terms of their similarity

Digital humanities · Epistemology · Higher education · Humanities · Pedagogy · Philosophy of education · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae