Mircea Eliade, Patterns in Comparative Religion (1949; trans. 1958)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14859342 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laurie L Patton (0000-0002-9405-8590) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 385-396 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0899-2363 • E-ISSN: 1527-8018 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/08992363-8090138 |
| OpenAlex | W3038144486 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
This article discusses the work of Mircea Eliade, especially Patterns in Comparative Religion, as an “Undead text.” Beginning with an analysis of Eliade’s work as it was understood in the 1980s, the author moves on to discuss the role of Patterns in the context of Eliade’s life throughout the twentieth century, including his wish to move away from his Romanian roots and far-right political associations. Patterns became an Undead text when Eliade’s critics argued that the work was part of a larger pattern of ahistorical, acontextual analysis. This critique was particularly trenchant in the context of more public discussion of his far-right past. The article ends by noting the ways in which Patterns is an Undead Text: it endures through conversations with colleagues who wish to rehabilitate Eliade’s work, if not his life; through syllabi in the “intellectual history” of the field; and through the lens of religion and literature
Context (archaeology · Field (mathematics · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Romanian · Sociology · Wish · Anthropology · Byzantine Studies and History · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |