The transparency of creoles
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14860366 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sterre Leufken (0000-0002-2251-1309, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, corresponding author), Sterre Leufkens (University of Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 323-362 |
| Publication date | 2013-08-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0920-9034 • E-ISSN: 1569-9870 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/jpcl.28.2.03leu |
| OpenAlex | W2156573700 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 17 |
In this article I propose that creoles are relatively transparent compared to their source languages. This means that they display more one-to-one relations between meaning and form. Transparency should be distinguished from the concepts of simplicity, ease of acquisition, and regularity. Definitions of these notions are given and it is shown how they have been mixed up in earlier literature. The transparency of creoles is explained as a result of language contact. When people speaking radically different languages communicate, they tend to use maximally intelligible forms, i.e. transparent forms. The repeated selection of transparent over opaque forms will lead to the formation of a relatively transparent language. Hence, creoles are predicted to be either as transparent as or more transparent than their source languages. An empirical study is performed to test this prediction. The transparency of four contact languages and their sub- and superstrates is measured by checking them on a list of non-transparent features. It turns out that they all exhibit opaque structures, but that there is a striking absence of so called form-based forms: linguistic elements and rules that are not motivated pragmatically or semantically. This indicates that such ‘empty’ forms are lost during intense language contact
Epistemology · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Opacity · Optics · Physics · Selection (genetic algorithm · Simplicity · Transparency (behavior · Computer Science · Language and cultural evolution · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence
Transparency in Norwegian and Icelandic
Second language education context and home language effect
Cognitive indigenization effects in the English dative alternation
Transparency and language contact
Linguistic complexity
What causes languages to be transparent
Are planned languages less complex than natural languages
Transparência e opacidade nos sistemas de negação sentencial em línguas indígenas brasileiras
Referência cruzada e concordância oracional no estudo de transparência e opacidade em línguas indígenas do Brasil
Alinhamento e estratégias de relativização
Transparência linguística
English Word-Formation
The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity
Pidgins and Creoles
The acquisition of some Dutch morphological rules
On the semantic opacity of creole languages
The nature of derivational morphology in creoles and non-creoles
Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles
The loss of negative concord in Standard English
Articles, adjectives and age of onset
Cliticization vs. Inflection
A Gujarati Reference Grammar
Referential markers and agreement markers in Functional Discourse Grammar
Negation in Natural Language
Sudan colloquial Arabic
Identifying the Creole Prototype
The Acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a Native Language
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2020 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |