Yes-in-my-backyard’
Spatial differences in the valuation of forest services and local co-benefits for carbon markets in México
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14865745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arturo Balderas Torres (0000-0002-8445-0759, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, corresponding author), Douglas C Macmillan (0000-0003-2573-5049, University of Kent), Margaret Skutsch (0000-0001-6120-4945, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico), Jon C Lovett (0000-0002-5839-3770, University of Leeds) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 109 |
| Pages | 130-141 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ecological Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0921-8009 • E-ISSN: 1873-6106 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.008 |
| OpenAlex | W2122964696 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 61 |
Business · Carbon offset · Contingent valuation · Economics · Economy · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Goods and services · Greenhouse gas · Logistic regression · Mixed logit · Natural resource economics · Recreation · Willingness to pay · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Ecology · Finance
Dissemination and perception of adaptation co-benefits
In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance
Environmentally friendly breeding, spatial heterogeneity and effective carbon offset design in beef cattle
Climate policy co-benefits
Multi‐species, multi‐country analysis reveals North Americans are willing to pay for transborder migratory species conservation
Compensation écologique et agriculture
Identifying Links between Economic Opportunities and Climate Change Adaptation
Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?
Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions
Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model
Innovation processes in governance
Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation
Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation
Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera
Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics
Heterogeneous Preferences Regarding Global Climate Change
On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities
Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking
The effect of distance on willingness to pay values
Determinants of pro-environmental consumption
Reducing barriers in future benefit transfers
The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments
Estimation of forest values using choice modeling
Respondent uncertainty in a contingent market for carbon offsets
Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests
Heterogeneity of preferences for the benefits of Environmental Stewardship
Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer
The economic value of wetland services
Sequestration offsets versus direct emission reductions
Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation
Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services
Reducing emissions from deforestation—The “combined incentives” mechanism and empirical simulations
The aggregation of environmental benefit values
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice
Payments for Ecosystem Services as Incentives for Collective Action
Capturing the Value of Forest Carbon for Local Livelihoods
The influence of personal values in the economic-use valuation of peri-urban green spaces
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,64 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2022 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |