Labour productivity gains or offshoring? Implications for post-growth proposals on the future of work
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14866697 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lukas Godé (Norwegian University of Life Sciences, corresponding author), Simon Mair (0000-0001-5143-8668, University of York), Erik Gomez‐baggethun (0000-0003-2690-2101, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research), Erik Gómez-Baggethun |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 239 |
| Pages | 108778 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ecological Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0921-8009 • E-ISSN: 1873-6106 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108778 |
| OpenAlex | W4413926632 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 65 |
Two visions prevail about the future of work in sustainable post-growth economies. According to the first, labour productivity gains resulting from technological development will enable to work less. The second contends instead that such gains are not always desirable and could be constrained by a shift towards less polluting production, potentially resulting in more work. Yet, conventional measures of labour productivity on which these proposals are based can conceal a displacement of labour requirements abroad. In this paper, we conduct a case study on Germany in 1995–2020 to assess whether and to which extent labour productivity gains result from offshoring, and implications for post-growth proposals on the future of work. We first retrieve global labour requirements of German production across upstream supply chains. We then decompose conventional labour productivity gains to evaluate whether they result from a reduction in global labour requirements or of their increased displacement towards upstream sectors. Finally, we examine possible impacts on labour offshoring of shifting production to sectors with low productivity gains. We use a socially extended Multi-Regional Input-Output model based on OECD data. Our results show that a quarter of the global labour requirements for German production is provided abroad. This share increased until 2007 before it stabilized or decreased. We identify some potential for working time reduction without increases in labour offshoring. Shifting to service sectors could furthermore reduce labour offshoring relative to production. Yet critically, German production may cover only a fraction of domestic consumption. Related implications for post-growth proposals require further attention. Highlights • Labour productivity gains can conceal a displacement of work requirements abroad. • We examine this possibility with an empirical study of Germany in 1995–2020. • Labour offshoring increased until 2007 before it stabilized or decreased. • Labour offshoring has played a limited role in driving labour productivity gains. • Our results have key implications for post-growth proposals on the future of work
Business · Economics · Labour economics · Macroeconomics · Natural resource economics · Offshoring · Outsourcing · Productivity · Economic Growth and Productivity · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Regional Development and Policy · Marketing
Capital in the Twenty-First Century
How Global Are Global Value Chains? A New Approach to Measure International Fragmentation
Unequal exchange of labour in the world economy
LMDI decomposition approach
Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth
Global Multiregional Input–output Frameworks
Environmental and social footprints of international trade
Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO2–GDP decoupling in high-income countries
The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis (*)
“Friday off”
The Global MRIO Lab – charting the world economy
The material footprint of nations
An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression
Tracing CO2 emissions in global value chains
A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II
Supply‐chain Trade
Sustainable Consumption and Worktime Reduction
Labor Embodied in Trade
The Employment Footprints of Nations
Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States
Productivity Trends in Advanced Countries between 1890 and 2012
Fair’ inequality, consumption and climate mitigation
The Post-growth Challenge
Environmental impacts of productivity-led working time reduction
Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice
The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations
Implementing the material footprint to measure progress towards Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 12
Functional specialisation in trade
Is Green Growth Possible
Could working less reduce pressures on the environment? A cross-national panel analysis of OECD countries, 1970–2007
The labour and resource use requirements of a good life for all
Providing decent living with minimum energy
Beware the Fallacy of Productivity Reductionism
Higher Wages for Sustainable Development? Employment and Carbon Effects of Paying a Living Wage in Global Apparel Supply Chains
Working time reduction policy in a sustainable economy
What structural change is needed for a post-growth economy
Towards a critical understanding of work in ecological economics
Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange
The profile of time allocation in the metabolic pattern of society
Worker wellbeing and productivity in advanced economies
Ecological labour or why environmentally friendly practices struggle to become mainstream
The international division of labor and embodied working time in trade for the US, the EU and China
Rethinking work for a just and sustainable future
A tale of two utopias
Ecologically unequal exchange and uneven development patterns along global value chains
Productivity and work in the ‘green economy
A good life for all within planetary boundaries
Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers from a Total-Flow Perspective
Decent Living Standards
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |