Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

National innovation systems and firms’ capital investment around the world

A N-tuple helix approach

Bibliographic Data

ID14869501
AuthorsApostolos Vetsikas (0000-0003-4118-7433, University of Thessaly, corresponding author), Charilaos Mertzanis (0000-0002-9028-5585, Abu Dhabi University), Athanasios Pavlopoulos (0000-0001-5498-1690, University of Thessaly)
Year2026
Publication date2026-03-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSmall Business Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0921-898X • E-ISSN: 1573-0913
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11187-026-01195-7
OpenAlexW7134894291
LanguageEN
References cited104

We examine whether national innovation system (NIS) performance shapes firms’ fixed-capital investment decisions across 93 countries from 2008 to 2020. We use firm-level data from the World Bank’s Enterprise Surveys and reconstruct a helix-based composite indicator (SFIGA) to measure countries’ innovation performance globally. The index integrates the roles of government, industry, academia, society, and finance. To capture the broader context, we include firm-level and country-level controls that reflect organizational, financial, and institutional factors. Probit estimates with sector, year, and country fixed effects indicate a robust positive association between national innovation performance and the propensity to invest in fixed assets. Results remain stable under instrumental variable estimation, Oster test, and propensity score matching. Mechanism tests indicate transmission through technology adoption, ICT export activities, and workforce training. Additional heterogeneity analyses show that system maturity matters. The evidence supports an actor-centered view of NISs and suggests that strengthening helix performance can crowd in corporate capital formation

Entrepreneurship · Human capital · Index (typography · Instrumental variable · Investment (military · National innovation system · Probit · Propensity score matching · Workforce · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models

  • Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation

    Open Access•Suling Feng, Rong Zhang et al.•Structural Change and Economic…•2022

  • Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Karl Aiginger, Dani Rodrik•Journal of Industry Competition…•2020

  • Innovation and firm growth

    Open Access•Alex Coad, Agustí Segarra‐Blasco et al.•Research Policy•2016

  • The Capital Structure Decisions of New Firms

    Alicia Robb, Alicia M Robb et al.•Review of Financial Studies•2014

  • Industrial Development, Globalization and Multinational Enterprises

    Rajneesh Narula, John H Dunning•Oxford Development Studies•2000

  • National Systems of Entrepreneurship

    Open Access•Zoltan J Acs, Eero Autio et al.•Research Policy•2014

  • Academic engagement and commercialisation

    Open Access•Markus Perkmann, Valentina Tartari et al.•Research Policy•2013

  • The Quintuple Helix innovation model

    Open Access•Elias G Carayannis, Thorsten D Barth et al.•Journal of Innovation and…•2012

  • Sectoral patterns of technical change

    Open Access•Keith Pavitt•Research Policy•1984

  • Fitting Fully Observed Recursive Mixed-process Models with cmp

    Open Access•David Roodman•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2011

  • The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1983

  • The role of international networks in upgrading national innovation systems

    Open Access•Monika Petraite, Muhammad Faraz Mubarak et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Configuration Paths to Efficient National Innovation Ecosystems

    Open Access•Viktor Prokop, Petr Hájek et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Evidence from Network Analysis application to Innovation Systems and Quintuple Helix

    Open Access•Ylenia Maruccia, Gianluca Solazzo et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability

    Emily Oster•Journal of Business and Economic…•2019

  • An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Units

    Brent R Moulton•The Review of Economics and…•1990

  • Measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems across levels

    Open Access•Sophia Hess, Andreas Wahl et al.•Small Business Economics•2025

  • A meta-analysis of entrepreneurial ecosystem elements and entrepreneurial activity

    Open Access•Martin Queissner, Lennard Stolz et al.•Small Business Economics•2025

  • Short-term financial constraints and SMEs’ investment decision

    Open Access•Théo Nicolas•Small Business Economics•2022

  • Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems

    Open Access•Franco Malerba, Margaret Mckelvey et al.•Small Business Economics•2020

  • The impact of firm and industry characteristics on small firms’ capital structure

    Open Access•Hans Degryse, Peter de Goeij et al.•Small Business Economics•2012

  • Does mobile money use increase firms’ investment? Evidence from Enterprise Surveys in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania

    Open Access•Asif Mohammed Islam, Asif Islam et al.•Small Business Economics•2018

  • R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms

    Open Access•Dirk Czarnitzki, Hanna Hottenrott•Small Business Economics•2011

  • Three dimensions of institutional contention

    Open Access•Martin B Carstensen, Christian Lyhne Ibsen•Socio-Economic Review•2019

  • ICT and economic growth – Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries

    Open Access•Thomas Niebel•World Development•2017

  • Variety of national innovation systems (NIS) and alternative pathways to growth beyond the middle-income stage

    Open Access•Keun Lee, Jongho Lee et al.•World Development•2021

  • Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework

    Open Access•Inmaculada Álvarez Ayuso, Inmaculada C Álvarez et al.•World Development•2017

  • A mediated model on the adoption of social media and SMEs’ performance in developing countries

    Open Access•Sikandar Ali Qalati, Yuan Li et al.•Technology in Society•2021

  • The International Dynamics of R&D and Innovation in the Long Run and in the Short Run

    Open Access•Laura Bottazzi, Giovanni Peri•The Economic Journal•2007

  • Financial constraints, government support, and firm innovation

    Radeef Chundakkadan, Subash Sasidharan•Innovation and Development•2019

  • Firms in International Trade

    Open Access•Andrew B Bernard, J Bradford Jensen et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2007

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae