How Potential New Members Approach an Online Community
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14871165 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Janghee Cho (0000-0001-5449-0699, University of Colorado Boulder, corresponding author), Rick Wash (0000-0003-4266-975X, Michigan State University) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 35-77 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0925-9724 • E-ISSN: 1573-7551 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10606-020-09390-0 |
| OpenAlex | W3125031087 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 44 |
Online communities, socio-technical systems where people interact with others, depend on new members coming to the community. While the majority of research in online communities relation to the recruitment of new members has focused on new members’ socialization and retention, little work has focused on how potential new members who are not yet a member of the community make the decision on whether they are willing to join in the online community. To understand this initial decision process, we investigated how potential new members build mental models of the online community from their first experience within the community, and how this process impacts the decision to continue participating in the community. We interviewed 31 potential new members of the online communities, Quora and Reddit, to better understand how they evaluate a new community. We found that the process of understanding a community involves orienting toward multiple different aspects of the community, including the content available on the community, the people who are already part of the community, and the technology interface and mechanisms that control the community. Participants who focused on consuming and enjoying content were much more likely to express an interest in future participation in these communities than participants who just evaluated the community, looking at the people in the community or the technology of the community. This extends previous considerations for recruiting new members in online communities. We conclude by discussing how our findings can have broad implications in developing successful online communities and suggesting future research efforts that could help understand potential new members
Community building · Community organization · Online community · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Socialization · Work (physics · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Engineering · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology · Wikis in Education and Collaboration
Verbal reports as data.
Validity and Qualitative Research
The Reader-to-Leader Framework
Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing
First I "like" it, then I hide it
Source Orientation in Human-Computer Interaction
On the importance and implications of studying technology non-use
Latent Users in an Online User-Generated Content Community
Mental Models
On looking into the black box
Situated Learning
Concepts and Folk Theories
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |