Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Negotiable Currencies

Hildegard of Bingen, Mysticism and the Vagaries of the Theoretical

Bibliographic Data

ID14948560
AuthorsSharon Jones, Sharon Patricia Jones (corresponding author), Diana Neal
Year2003
Volume11
Issue3
Pages375-384
Publication date2003-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFeminist Theology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0966-7350 • E-ISSN: 1745-5189
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/096673500301100310
OpenAlexW1978016433
LanguageEN

This article argues that, of the leading Continental feminist theorists who have expressed an interest in women's mysticism, most have inadvertently or otherwise taken up the theoretical model of William James, the early-twentieth-century scholar of religion. In particular, Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray have accepted the view that mysticism operates on an epistemological plane divorced from the categories of rationality and intelligibility. Both thinkers hold that the mystic is typically hysterical, although Irigaray takes a more positive view of the hysteric as a subject position from which the feminine voice is first heard. Through a brief examination of the mystical and political careers of Hildegard of Bingen, we conclude that the theoretical perspective of Julia Kristeva provides a more useful theoretical perspective from which to analyse women's mystical texts

Art · Epistemology · Literature · Mysticism · Psychoanalysis · Rationality · Theology · French Historical and Cultural Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae