Is Kant's Concept of Reason Compromised by Misogyny and if so Can it be Retrieved
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14948799 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Deborah Knowles (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 29 |
| Pages | 61-70 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Theology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-7350 • E-ISSN: 1745-5189 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/096673500200002906 |
| OpenAlex | W2136278982 |
| Language | EN |
In this essay I examine the concept of reason bequeathed to us by Kant. I draw upon the work of a number of feminist philosophers who have broken new ground in Kantian scholarship. I seek to build upon their work by forging connections with material that although disparate I believe to be ultimately complementary. I track the development of Kant's thought through two texts: Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime 1764 and Critique of Pure Reason 1781. My purpose is twofold. Firstly, I examine Kant's strategy and possible allegiance to the maintenance of the patriarchal order in the context of enlightenment thought. Secondly I consider the implications of his strategy for the emergent concept of reason and the need for and possibility of retrieval. I conclude that reason is essentially egalitarian and provides us with the potential for the dismantling of the perpetuation of misogyny
Aesthetics · Allegiance · Common ground · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Sublime · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|