Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is Kant's Concept of Reason Compromised by Misogyny and if so Can it be Retrieved

Bibliographic Data

ID14948799
AuthorsDeborah Knowles (corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume10
Issue29
Pages61-70
Publication date2002-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFeminist Theology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0966-7350 • E-ISSN: 1745-5189
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/096673500200002906
OpenAlexW2136278982
LanguageEN

In this essay I examine the concept of reason bequeathed to us by Kant. I draw upon the work of a number of feminist philosophers who have broken new ground in Kantian scholarship. I seek to build upon their work by forging connections with material that although disparate I believe to be ultimately complementary. I track the development of Kant's thought through two texts: Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime 1764 and Critique of Pure Reason 1781. My purpose is twofold. Firstly, I examine Kant's strategy and possible allegiance to the maintenance of the patriarchal order in the context of enlightenment thought. Secondly I consider the implications of his strategy for the emergent concept of reason and the need for and possibility of retrieval. I conclude that reason is essentially egalitarian and provides us with the potential for the dismantling of the perpetuation of misogyny

Aesthetics · Allegiance · Common ground · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Sublime · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae