Overcoming tobacco industry opposition to standardized packaging in the Americas
Bibliographic Data
Countries in the Region of the Americas have been slow to adopt standardized packaging of tobacco products. The objectives of this analysis are to report on the progress made in adopting such packaging in countries in the Region, review known tobacco industry strategies for opposing these policies and discuss the resources available to academics, advocates and policy-makers who might be interested in advancing the use of standardized packaging in the Region. Of the 23 countries worldwide that have fully adopted standardized packaging laws, only 2 are in the Region (Canada and Uruguay). Six other countries (Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico and Panama) have tried to introduce standardized packaging through draft bills, all of which have been delayed or withdrawn. There are indications that the tobacco industry has used its playbook of arguments to oppose the policy in those countries, including allegations that standardized packaging breaches national laws and international treaties protecting intellectual property, alongside threats of litigation. It is possible that these threats and allegations may have had a greater effect in the Region because of the lengthy (6 years) and costly (legal fees of US$ 10 million) international investment arbitration brought by Philip Morris International against Uruguay’s strong tobacco packaging laws. However, all of the industry’s arguments have been debunked, and national courts and international legal forums have upheld standardized packaging as a lawful policy. Governments in the Region of the Americas should follow the examples of Canada and Uruguay and reject the industry’s false arguments and litigation threats. This analysis discusses some of the financial and technical resources that can assist them
Arbitration · Business · Intellectual property · International trade · Opposition (politics · Political science · Tobacco industry · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law
Controlling corporate influence in health policy making? An assessment of the implementation of article 5.3 of the World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control
A multi-level, multi-jurisdictional strategy
Advancing progressive health policy to reduce NCDs amidst international commercial opposition
Containing diffusion
FCTC followed by accelerated implementation of tobacco advertising bans
Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay
Analysis of Article 6 (tax and price measures to reduce the demand for tobacco products) of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
Illicit tobacco trade is ‘booming’
Moving in the right direction
Progress in adopting bans on tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship in the Americas
United States Food and Drug Administration’s authorization of reduced exposure claims for Iqos ®
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |