Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Implementation of second round of HPV-based screening for cervical cancer in programmatic contexts in Argentina

Bibliographic Data

ID14968593
AuthorsPilar Barcena Barbeira (Buenos Aires, corresponding author), Melisa Paolino (0000-0002-8649-1570, Buenos Aires), Fernando Binder (0000-0002-0964-8685, Buenos Aires), Maribel Almonte (0000-0003-1623-8323, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland), Armando Baena (0000-0001-8717-6911, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France), Juan David Mazzadi (0009-0008-6980-3713, Buenos Aires), Silvina Arrossi (0000-0002-5071-0938, Buenos Aires)
Year2025
Volume49
Pages1
Publication date2025-08-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1020-4989 • E-ISSN: 1680-5348
PublisherPan American Health Organization (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.26633/rpsp.2025.92
PMID40895372
OpenAlexW4413774910
LanguageEN
References cited29

Objectives. To evaluate implementation of the second round of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening, introduced in Argentina in 2012–2014 through the Jujuy Demonstration Project for women 30 years and older, and describe the characteristics of women who adhere to the recommended five-year rescreening interval. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on the data of two rounds of screening. All women aged 30 years or older who had been HPV-tested during the Jujuy Demonstration Project and had a negative result were included. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to evaluate implementation. Multivariable regression was used to examine factors associated with adherence to rescreening. Results. Of 42 307 HPV-negative women, 47.9% ( n = 20 285) were rescreened in the second round (Reach); 69.2% of health centers provided at least one HPV test at second-round screening (Adoption); and 13.3% ( n = 5 639) of women were rescreened within the recommended five-year interval. Among the total rescreened, 9.3% ( n = 1 888) were HPV-positive, of which 95.0% underwent triage Pap and 79.2% of the HPV-positive/abnormal Pap women had colposcopy. Considering women rescreened at five years, the second-round detection rate was 5.3/1 000 screened women. Rescreening at five years was significantly higher among women aged 30–44, with public health insurance, and those living in the provincial capital. Conclusions. Rescreening of HPV-negative women faced challenges linked to its reduced reach, especially if we consider the recommended five-year interval. Our findings suggest that we need to devise specific strategies to increase second-round screening rates

Cancer · Cervical cancer · Cervical cancer screening · Gynecology · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Medicine · Internal Medicine

  • Social inequality in Pap smear coverage

    Silvina Arrossi, Silvina Ramos et al.•Reproductive Health Matters•2008

  • The RE-AIM Framework

    Bridget Gaglio, Jo Ann Shoup et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2013

  • Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions

    Russell E Glasgow, Thomas Vogt et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1999

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae