Impediments besetting the negotiations for a comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and East and Southern Africa (2007–2014)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14969267 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Knowledge H Matarutse (Bindura University, Zimbabwe, corresponding author), Ronald Chipaike (0000-0001-7722-7383, Bindura University, Zimbabwe) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 355-374 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | South African Journal of International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1022-0461 • E-ISSN: 1938-0275 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10220461.2017.1382386 |
| OpenAlex | W2767606986 |
| Language | EN |
Several African, Caribbean and Pacific countries are currently negotiating World Trade Organization (WTO)-compatible reciprocal economic partnership agreements (EPAs) with the European Union (EU), agreements intended to supersede the one-sided trade preferences of the Lomé Convention. This study focuses on impediments which have bedevilled the EU–East and Southern Africa (ESA) negotiations for a transition from an interim EPA to a comprehensive EPA. These talks, which ran from 2007 to 2014, followed the expiry of a WTO waiver and the ESA's successful resistance to elements of the EU's agenda considered offensive, despite envisaged benefits provided for by the Cotonou Partnership Agreement of 2000 calling for EPAs. The study is based on qualitative primary research in which data from interviews was augmented by a synthesis of secondary sources and analysed through a thematic coding system. Findings reveal asymmetrical power relations, a marked heterogeneity in the ESA and outstanding issues in the interim EPA and WTO regulations as major impediments to the transition to a comprehensive EPA
Business · Economics · European union · General partnership · Interim · International trade · Negotiation · Offensive · Political science · Global trade and economics · International Development and Aid · Law · World Trade Organization Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |