The survival of Nepad and the African peer review mechanism
A critical analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14969286 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ross Herbert (0000-0002-2188-7136, South African Institute of International Affairs, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21-38 |
| Publication date | 2004-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | South African Journal of International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1022-0461 • E-ISSN: 1938-0275 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10220460409545441 |
| OpenAlex | W2079470174 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
A lack of definition, poor communication and organisational weaknesses are damaging Nepad just as its most important venture — peer review — begins. The article asks how long Nepad can survive without robust delivery and plain talk about its future
Development economics · Economics · Epistemology · Peer review · Political economy · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Community Development and Social Impact · Law · Private Equity and Venture Capital
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,11 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2014 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |