Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Fetishised Gift

The Legal Status of Flags

Bibliographic Data

ID14970882
AuthorsGraeme Orr (0000-0003-0614-6732, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume19
Issue3
Pages504-526
Publication date2010-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGriffith Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1038-3441 • E-ISSN: 1839-4205
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10383441.2010.10854686
OpenAlexW3122526113
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited5

Accounts of the relationship between flags and the law have focused on a narrow strain of contentions drawn from debates about political expression. This essay seeks to bridge the gap between cultural studies’ insight into nationalism and its symbolics, and the flag’s legal status, to better understand the unique position occupied by national flags. Flag ‘waving’ has become more prevalent in many liberal democracies. In such societies, flags occupy not a religious role, but a quiet and quotidian place in what Billig terms ‘banal nationalism’. As a cipher for the whole, a particular flag’s design is relatively unimportant; what lends it power is a mix of the gravity bestowed by its official designation and the easy commodification lent by a flag’s easy reproducibility and portability. Unlike other state symbols such as the currency, coat of arms and honorifics, the state does not seek to monopolise the flag’s use, let alone define its meaning. An analysis of the laws in several countries governing flag designation, observance and ‘desecration’ reveals that the law accords the flag distinct status yet only equivocal protection. While the state may crave its citizens’ fealty, a flag is not a symbol of some distant governmentality. Rather, it is gifted to ‘the people’ and relies for its relevance on its organic proliferation. As both object and image, people attribute a power to the flag – a power they recognise over themselves and others with whom they share a body politic. A key source of this fetishisation is its official, legal designation. Though it embodies no particular values, a flag is valued, even fetishised, by flag-wavers and flag-burners alike

Political science · Sociology · Law · Renaissance and Early Modern Studies

  • Fair Go? Indigenous Rugby League Players and the Racial Exclusion of the Australian National Anthem

    Open Access•J Cleland, D Adair et al.•Communication & Sport•2020

  • Migrant Responses to Popular Uses of the A ustralian Flag

    Open Access•Catherine Austin, Farida Fozdar•Studies in Ethnicity and…•2015

  • Australia Day, flags on cars and Australian nationalism

    Open Access•Farida Fozdar, Brian Spittles et al.•Journal of Sociology•2015

  • Monuments & maidens

    Marina Warner•Monuments & maidens•1985

  • The anatomy of national fantasy

    Lauren Gail Berlant•The anatomy of national fantasy•1991

  • Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism

    Anthony Reid, Benedict Anderson•Pacific Affairs•1985

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,27
Citation span2015 - 2020 (6)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae