Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nostalgia for a Reconciled Future

Scenes of Catharsis and Apology in Israel and Australia

Bibliographic Data

ID14970893
AuthorsJuliet Rogers (0000-0003-0304-5266, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume20
Issue2
Pages252-270
Publication date2011-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGriffith Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1038-3441 • E-ISSN: 1839-4205
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10383441.2011.10854698
OpenAlexW1972365040
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited2

Catharsis has become a key concept in facilitating the healing of nations and individuals after trauma. It is implicitly required of people who testify before nation-building trials and truth commissions, and it is desired of the audience to nation-building events. Catharsis is intended to facilitate the nostalgic promise to produce the reconciled nation in the future. Catharsis, however, was abandoned in psychoanalysis because of its short-lived effects and the tendency for subjects, as Freud describes it, to ‘fall ill’ again in similar ways. This tendency is because, despite the heightened emotional appearance of catharsis, the inner conflict of the patients is not resolved. In this article, I discuss the role of catharsis in the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem and in the recent Apology to Australia’s Indigenous people, and consider how the very demand for catharsis can foreclose prematurely on possibilities for tolerating the crucial conflicts that emerge in projects of nation-building and reconciliation, specifically when those conflicts involve the assuming of incommensurable positions – such as that of perpetrator and of victim

Aesthetics · Catharsis · Indigenous · Political science · Project commissioning · Psychoanalysis · Publishing · Sociology · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The Archive as Confessional

    Juliet Rogers, Juliet Brough Rogers•Journal of Human Rights Practice•2016

  • The politics of ‘whataboutery’

    Open Access•Adrian Little, Juliet Rogers et al.•The British Journal of Politics…•2016

  • When reconciliation means reparations

    Maria Rae•Griffith Law Review•2015

  • The Symptoms of the Political Unconscious

    Open Access•Juliet Rogers, Juliet B Rogers et al.•Political Psychology•2017

  • Confessions without guilt

    Open Access•Yeşim Yaprak Yıldız, Patrick Baert•Theory and Society•2021

  • No Future Without Forgiveness

    Open Access•Archbishop Desmond Tutu•New Perspectives Quarterly•1999

  • After the Fact

    Milton Viorst•Journal of Palestine Studies•1995

Citations per year0.45
Citation span2015 - 2021 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae