Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ethical Considerations for Learning to Use Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Health Research

Bibliographic Data

ID14993732
AuthorsR Aída Hernández (0000-0003-4919-5753, University of Missouri, corresponding author), Kyle Werner (Institute of Seismology)
Year2026
Pages10497323261425889-10497323261425889
Publication date2026-03-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQualitative Health Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-7323 • E-ISSN: 1552-7557
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/10497323261425889
PMID41793252
OpenAlexW7134178342
LanguageEN
References cited27

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are rapidly expanding in qualitative health research and often promise improved efficiency or novel discoveries. However, this promise has yet to be realized, and further, serious ethical issues emerge ranging from the use of AI videoconferencing technologies to conduct interviews, AI transcription services, and AI-augmented qualitative analysis tools. These ethical dilemmas are not always obvious and require careful consideration of the ramifications of integrating these technologies in the research process. These concerns are relevant to all stages of research experience ranging from emerging scholars to more practiced researchers but are particularly significant in training new scholars who are early adopters of AI technologies. To trace the ethical issues surrounding AI in the practice of qualitative health research, we map the specific values of autonomy, privacy, validity, and equity to highlight decision points and provide a framework for navigating ethical use of the AI tools

Emerging technologies · Equity (law · Ethical issues · Health care · Qualitative research · Research ethics · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications

  • The construction of the role of AI in qualitative data analysis in the social sciences

    Open Access•T M Paulus, Trena Paulus et al.•AI & Society•2026

  • Can generative AI reliably synthesise literature? exploring hallucination issues in ChatGPT

    Open Access•Amr Adel, Noor H S Alani et al.•AI & Society•2025

  • Raising the curtain

    Rivka Tuval-Mashiach•Qualitative Psychology•2017

  • Prompts, Pearls, Imperfections

    Open Access•Jonas Wachinger, Kate Bärnighausen et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2024

  • Ways That Qualitative Researchers Engage in “Technological Reflexivity”

    Open Access•T M Paulus, Elizabeth M Pope et al.•Qualitative Inquiry•2025

  • What Does ChatGPT Mean for Qualitative Health Research

    Open Access•M Van Manen•Qualitative Health Research•2023

  • The Ethics of Using Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•David T Marshall, David Naff•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2024

  • Artificial Intelligence Augmented Qualitative Analysis

    Open Access•Danielle Hitch•Qualitative Health Research•2024

  • Qualitative Research in the Era of AI

    Open Access•Georgios Chatzichristos•International Journal of…•2025

  • Me and the Machines

    Open Access•Laura A Chubb•International Journal of…•2023

  • Should ChatGPT help with my research? A caution against artificial intelligence in qualitative analysis

    Open Access•Charlotte Friedman, Aleksa Owens et al.•Qualitative Research•2025

  • In Minutes Instead of Weeks

    Open Access•T M Paulus, Vittorio Marone•Qualitative Inquiry•2025

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae