Ophthalmology for the Myopic Methodologist
A Review of Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14995587 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carl Root (University of South Florida, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Publication date | 2014-12-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Report (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-0147 • E-ISSN: 2160-3715 |
| Publisher | Nova Southeastern University (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1328 |
| OpenAlex | W64052056 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
In Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis, Frederick J. Wertz, Kathy Charmaz, Linda M. McMullen, Ruthellen Josselson, and Rosemarie Anderson provide students and researchers with both a broad knowledge base and specific examples of each of their preferred methods of analysis. The authors apply their respective expertise of phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry to sixth author Emalinda McSpadden's narrative of responding to an unfortunate situation. The result is a comprehensive comparison of each method emphasizing unique strengths and weaknesses in each approach as well as the reflexivity required of researchers utilizing such analyses
Epistemology · Grounded theory · Interpretative phenomenological analysis · Linguistics · Narrative · Narrative inquiry · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Strengths and weaknesses · Philosophy · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|