What do we know about the intersection of being blind and being Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand? Taking an applied community psychology approach to a systematic review of the published literature
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14996019 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rebekah Graham (0000-0002-6576-4023, Parents of Vision Impaired (Inc) NZ Frankton Hamilton New Zealand), Bridgette Masters‐awatere (0000-0002-7684-5080, School of Psychology University of Waikato Hamilton New Zealand), Chrissie Cowan (0000-0002-6947-5843, Kāpō Māori Aoteaora New Zealand Inc Hastings New Zealand) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1171-1197 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-9284 • E-ISSN: 1099-1298 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/casp.2700 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 37 |
Self‐determination and dignity are guaranteed rights for disabled persons under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. However, such rights have been slow to eventuate for Māori (Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand). This paper brings together systematic fashion publications that currently exist regarding blindness and Māori, centring throughout Māori understandings of disability and blindness. We employed a structured approach alongside PRISMA protocols and reflexive dialogue. Included publications were quantitative data reviews, surveys, qualitative studies, literature reviews and works of fiction. For our analysis, we formulated a matrix that drew from Kaupapa Māori, applied community psychology and disability rights literature. This meant we made explicit where research practices included—and excluded—self‐determination, democratic participation and inclusion of both disabled and Māori. Our review highlights inconsistency across disciplines regarding self‐determination and democratic participation by both Māori and disabled key stakeholders. Our approach can be utilised across disciplines as a tool for considering the ways in which researchers uphold Indigenous self‐determination, disability rights and data sovereignty.
Indigenous Data Sovereignty
Nothing About Us Without Us
Colonial histories, racism and health—The experience of Māori and Indigenous peoples
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Eye care delivery models to improve access to eye care for Indigenous peoples in high-income countries
Implementation framework for chronic disease intervention effectiveness in Māori and other indigenous communities
Seeing the unseen
Observations by and Conversations with Health Workers and Hospital Personnel Involved in Transferring Māori Patients and Whānau to Waikato Hospital in Aotearoa New Zealand
Culturally competent communication in Indigenous disability assessment
Disabled person-led monitoring
On the Historical and Conceptual Foundations of a Community Psychology of Social Transformation
Value‐Based Praxis in Community Psychology
On Becoming Scholars and Activists for Disability Rights
Caregiver experiences of racism are associated with adverse health outcomes for their children
Wellness as Fairness
Provocations for Critical Disability Studies
What's so 'critical' about critical disability studies
Using Sandelowski and Barroso's Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence
The significance of socially-assigned ethnicity for self-identified Māori accessing and engaging with primary healthcare in New Zealand
Decolonizing Methodologies
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |