Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Heidegger, the Law of Being, and Animal Protection Laws

Bibliographic Data

ID15021764
AuthorsSchalow Schalow (Indiana University, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume20
Issue2
Pages61
Publication date2015-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthics & the Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-6633 • E-ISSN: 1535-5306
PublisherIndiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2979/ethicsenviro.20.2.61
OpenAlexW2232917650
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited8

For decades, Martin Heidegger’s thinking has been appropriated as providing an ethical foundation either in support of positions of environmentalism or advocacy on behalf of animals. Yet, as is the case in many of these debates, the focus has been slanted toward the ethical or moral dimension, to the exclusion of considering whether the Heideggerian approach could also be transposed into the complementary arena of the law in order to open up a new avenue for discussing these topics. Precisely due to its non-anthropocentric focus on the one hand, and its divergence from the legalistic tradition of “rights-theory,” on the other, Heidegger’s thinking might very well provide an entry point for addressing concerns raised by enacting “laws” to protect animals, albeit on an alternative footing, which circumvents the “legalistic” premise that animals are precluded rights (due to their lacking as a precondition the moral agency proper to human beings). In the following, I will argue that Heidegger’s account of our capacity to dwell on the earth, to cultivate the diverse manifestations of Nature, and recover the deeper meaning of our embodiment , suggests an alternative grounding of law, the attuned response to which can suggest new “directives” to protect the livelihood of animals in the habitats they occupy in common with our own. As we will discover, to understand the law in this primordial sense requires disclosing its origin in the Greek notion of justice, and thereby resetting the “bounds” of jurisdiction within which such lawfulness can be extended to protect animals and provide a “ measure ” to counter balance the self-interested motives of human beings in our technological age

Anthropocentrism · Economic Justice · Environmental ethics · Environmental law · Epistemology · Law and economics · Meaning (existential · Political science · Premise · Sentience · Sociology · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy

  • Antropomorfismo e alterità animale

    Chiara Pasqualin•Heidegger Studies / Heidegger…•2024

  • Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy

    Hannah Arendt, Ronald Beiner•Lectures on Kant's Political…•1982

  • Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy

    Julian H Franklin•Animal rights and moral philosophy•2004

  • Animal RightsCurrent Debates and New Directions

    Cass R Sunstein, Martha C Nussbaum et al.•Animal rights•2005

  • Heidegger's Support for Deep Ecology Reexamined Once Again

    Magdalena Hoły-Łuczaj, Holy-Luczaj Holy-Luczaj•Ethics & the Environment•2015

  • Identification With Nature

    Christian Diehm•Ethics & the Environment•2007

  • Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity

    Open Access•William Vaughan, Michael J Zimmerman et al.•South Central Review•1993

  • Animals, Heidegger, and the Right to Life

    George Cave, George S Cave•Environmental Ethics•1982

  • Die Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den Transzendentalen Grundsatzen

    Wolfgang Schwarz, Martin Heidegger•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1964

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae