Acupuncture Anesthesia on American Bodies
Communism, Race, and the Cold War in the Making of “Legitimate” Medical Science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15024410 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emmi Baum (0000-0003-0856-1921, corresponding author), Emily Baum |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 497-527 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the history of medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-5140 • E-ISSN: 1086-3176 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/bhm.2021.0055 |
| PMID | 35125353 |
| OpenAlex | W4210382554 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
This article explores the brief American fascination with acupuncture anesthesia, a technique in which needling was used in place of, or in combination with, chemical anesthetics during surgery. In 1971, a series of American medical delegations began traveling to China to observe the procedure and gauge its viability. While some of these physicians were optimistic about the technique's therapeutic possibilities, others were antagonistic to its feasibility in an American context. Previous studies have explained the quick rise and rapid delegitimization of acupuncture anesthesia by invoking the professional interests of biomedical doctors. In contrast, this article rethinks the history of the procedure by casting it against the backdrop of the Cold War. In discussions about the legitimacy of the technique, assumptions about race, communist politics, and Cold War bipolarity were omnipresent, causing acupuncture anesthesia to become a synecdoche for the promises and perils of Chinese communism writ large
Acupuncture · Alternative medicine · China · Cold war · Communism · Context (archaeology) · Dry needling · Legitimacy · Pathology · Political science · Politics · Race (biology) · Sociology · Gender Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · History of Medicine Studies · Law · Medical History and Innovations · Medicine
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |