Introduction
Simultaneously Global and Local: Reassessing Smallpox Vaccination and Its Spread, 1789–1900
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15024945 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sanjoy Bhattacharya (0000-0002-5279-4047, Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine), Niels Brimnes (0000-0002-5807-8762) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Publication date | 2009-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the history of medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-5140 • E-ISSN: 1086-3176 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/bhm.0.0194 |
| PMID | 19329839 |
| OpenAlex | W2092433149 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 8 |
The last two decades have seen a reawakening of scholarly interest in the history of smallpox prevention. Accounts of vaccination and others efforts at controlling smallpox have moved away from heroic narratives toward more nuanced and contextualized understandings. It is now accepted that several viruses traveled under the vaccine label from the outset, and it has been demonstrated that a variety of techniques were used to perform vaccination operations. The character of nineteenth century sea voyages that took the vaccine to distant territories has also been re-examined; sometimes the spread of the vaccine was caused by private networks and ad hoc decisions, while at other times it was the result of enterprises with close resemblances to contemporary centralized vaccination campaigns. Looking beyond Europe and North America we encounter a variety of state attitudes toward vaccination, ranging from concentrated efforts to spread the technique to efforts more uncertain and diluted. Although the reluctance to accept vaccination has been amply documented, recent studies emphasize this should not be attributed to simplistic dichotomies of modernity versus tradition or science versus culture; instead, instances of resistance are best studied as specific contextualized interactions. Indeed, factors like favorable geography, strong bureaucratic structures, and the absence of variolation seem to have helped the relatively smooth transfer of vaccination technologies. Perhaps most important, recent research encourages us to continue to study smallpox vaccination as a phenomenon that was simultaneously global and local
Biology · Political economy · Political science · Smallpox · Smallpox vaccine · Sociology · Vaccination · Vaccinia · Variety (cybernetics) · Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research · Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus · Historical Medical Research and Treatments · Medicine · Virology
Kolonialherrschaft, Pocken und Emotionen im bourbonischen Oaxaca
The Cowpox Controversy
Carrying the Pox
The Global Menace
Instruments and agents of control
Instrumentos y agentes de control
A Case of Exemplarity
Boulol and Thunna Thunna
The discontinuation of routine smallpox vaccination in the United States, 1960-1976
Another vaccine, another story
Vaccinating against Vasoori
Covid-19 Response in South Asia
Building a Strong Nation
Control, contención y educación higiénica en las campañas de vacunación contra la viruela en México durante la década de 1940
Contagion and the State in Europe, 1830-1930
The Vaccinators
Variolation and vaccination in South Asia, c. 1700–1865
The "Real Expedicion Maritima de la Vacuna" in New Spain and Guatemala
The History of Smallpox Vaccination in Germany
Crisis, charisma and triage
Care, welfare, and treason
Science in a Democracy
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,88 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2026 (17) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |