Constructing Scientific Psychology
Karl Lashley's Mind-Brain Debates (review)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15026990 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hans Pols (0000-0003-1722-3860, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 353-354 |
| Publication date | 2001-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the history of medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-5140 • E-ISSN: 1086-3176 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/bhm.2001.0091 |
| OpenAlex | W2030233086 |
| Language | EN |
This biography is the first study to appear of the famous neurobiologist and psychologist Karl S. Lashley. Nadine Weidman thoroughly analyzes the position of Lashley's neuropsychological scholarship within the context of the major debates that have occurred within psychology and neurology over the last sixty years: between the protagonists of behaviorism and psychoneurology, between environmentalists and hereditarians, and, within neurology, about reductionism, or whether science could account for the role of consciousness and free will in human behavior. Despite his earlier association with John B. Watson, Lashley has always been opposed to behaviorism. He emphasized the irreducible spontaneity of behavior and, as a neurologist, investigated the relationship between brain and behavior
Art history · Behaviorism · Biography · Cognition · Cognitive science · Consciousness · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · History of psychology · Neuropsychology · Psychoanalysis · Psychotherapist · Reductionism · Scholarship · Watson · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · History · Law · Neuroscience · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Representations and Identity
| Highly cited | No |
|---|