Reconciliation as Endless Process
The Limits of Reconciliatory Politics and the Possibility of Indigenous Redress
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15030262 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shaun A Stevenson (0000-0001-9279-8942, corresponding author), Shaun Stevenson, Dallas Hunt (0009-0005-6939-7450) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 42-66 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory & Event (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1092-311X • E-ISSN: 2572-6633 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/tae.2025.a947373 |
| OpenAlex | W4405549869 |
| Language | EN |
This article examines how reconciliatory discourse, especially its intersection with law, politics, and academic engagement, often foregrounds immaterial processes at the expense of substantive, material outcomes for Indigenous peoples. We engage the dominant lexicon of reconciliation, examining its mobilization across academic, legal, and political domains, and its potential for deferring material outcomes for Indigenous communities. Through examination of recent scholarship in the humanities and social sciences as well as the case study of the decision in Coldwater Indian Band et al. v. Canada , we argue that a focus on reconciliation as an endless process undermines Indigenous self-determination and meaningful redress
Biology · Indigenous · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Redress · Sociology · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Computer Science · Law · Ecology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|