A perspective from the history of scientific journals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15031060 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melinda Baldwin (0000-0002-1966-5198, American Institute of Physics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 363-368 |
| Publication date | 2018-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1093-4510 • E-ISSN: 1939-0610 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/hop0000108 |
| PMID | 30421947 |
| OpenAlex | W2900652946 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 4 |
In their articles for this special issue on digital humanities, Jeremy Burman (2018) and Ivan Flis and Nees Jan van Eck (Flis & van Eck, 2018) examine how psychology journals can be used as sources for large-scale data sets that might illuminate the development of psychology as a research discipline. In my commentary, I seek to situate these two articles in a broader history of scientific publishing and offer further thoughts on the possibilities and pitfalls of data-based methods for the history of scientific publishing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
Digital humanities · Epistemology · History of psychology · Library science · MEDLINE · Political science · PsycINFO · Publishing · Scientific communication · Social science · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Representations and Identity
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |