Copia "versus" original-múltiple. Una relación dialógica en el arte gráfico reproducible
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15036313 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hortensia Mínguez-García (0000-0002-8531-4572, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Arte individuo y sociedad (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1131-5598 • E-ISSN: 1698-0611 |
| Publisher | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5209/rev_aris.2013.v25.n1.41165 |
| OpenAlex | W2037445746 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 2 |
The concept of graphic work in the practice of graphic art (seriable and/or reproducible), has changed in parallel to our way of thinking and delimit legislatively ideas as limit copying, reproduction, creation, multiple, original, edition, etc. In what context we begin to consider the concept of copy pejoratively? Is this because the design of regulatory systems that we devised to protect the rights of artists to reproduce his graphic works? This text addresses the relativization that the interdisciplinary creative processes of contemporary artists have produced on the concept of graphic art, and on the traditional dichotomy “copy versus multiple-original”
Art · Art history · Context (archaeology · Copying · Limit (mathematics · Political science · Visual arts · Advertising and Communication Studies · Architecture, Art, Education · History · Law · Mathematics · Photographic and Visual Arts
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2020 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |