Los tipos de capital social bonding, bridging y linking
Una revisión de los indicadores cuantitativos utilizados para su operacionalización
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15039898 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alejandro Gonzalez-Heras (0000-0003-0279-0408, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, corresponding author), Alejandro González Heras |
| Year | 2023 |
| Issue | 58 |
| Pages | 75-97 |
| Publication date | 2023-04-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Empiria Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1139-5737 • E-ISSN: 2174-0682 |
| Publisher | UNED - Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5944/empiria.58.2023.37381 |
| OpenAlex | W4388051008 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
Los objetivos de este artículo son: primero, revisar cuáles son los indicadores cuantitativos utilizados en la literatura para aproximarse a los tipos de capital social bonding, bridging y linking; y, segundo, revisar su proceso de operacionalización. Se da cuenta de la ambigüedad metodológica con la que estos conceptos son tratados. Se argumenta que existe un buen número de indicadores que no se adecuan a los conceptos teóricos, basándonos en: (i) el solapamiento de indicadores elegidos que se da entre las dimensiones del concepto; (ii) la ambigüedad teórica del capital social en su definición (especialmente en la perspectiva comunitaria); (iii) la ambigüedad empírica en la elección de indicadores; (iv) la falta de un diseño ad hoc para medir el capital social. The objectives of this article are: first, to review the quantitative indicators used in the literature to measure bonding, bridging and linking types of social capital; and, second, to review its operationalization process. It takes into consideration the methodological ambiguity with which these concepts are treated. It is argued that there is a good number of indicators that do not represent the theoretical concepts, based on: (i) the overlapping of chosen indicators between the dimensions of the concept; (ii) the theoretical ambiguity of social capital in its definition (especially from the communitarian approach); (iii) the empirical ambiguity in the choice of indicators; (iv) the lack of an ad hoc design to measure social capital
Ambiguity · Bridging (networking · Economics · Epistemology · Humanities · Operationalization · Social capital · Social science · Sociology · Welfare economics · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Philosophy · Social Capital and Networks · Social Sciences and Policies
Social Capital and Health Outcomes Among Older Adults in China
Social Capital and Health-Protective Behavior Intentions in an Influenza Pandemic
Capturing Bonding, Bridging, and Linking Social Capital through Publicly Available Data
Japanese social capital and social vulnerability indices
Social Networks and Status Attainment
Bowling Alone
The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born
La fuerza de los lazos
Is Neighbourhood Linking Social Capital Associated With Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality? A National Cohort Study From Sweden
The Burden of Excessive “Linking Social Capital”
Community resilience and health
Linking social capital and self-rated health
Lessons from the Dzud
Community gardening, neighborhood meetings, and social capital
Social Capital and Neighbourhoods that Work
Social capitals, social class, and prosperity in high-trust and low-trust societies
Political Distrust and Social Capital in Europe and the USA
Bridging the Divide
Las perspectivas del capital social, parte I
Low linking social capital as a predictor of coronary heart disease in Sweden
Low-linking social capital as a predictor of mental disorders
Measuring the Returns to Networking and the Accumulation of Social Capital
Measuring Tie Strength
The Strength of Weak Ties
Social Capital
Reflections on Conceptualizing and Measuring Tie Strength
The Strength of Weak Ties
Social Capital and Health in China
| Highly cited | No |
|---|