Les concessions de conservation sonnent-elles le glas de l'aménagement forestier durable
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15062257 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alain Karsenty (0000-0001-6911-926X, corresponding author), Robert Nasi (0000-0001-9739-3135) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 177 |
| Pages | 153-162 |
| Publication date | 2004-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Tiers-Monde (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1963-1359 • E-ISSN: 1293-8882 |
| Publisher | PERSEE Program (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3406/tiers.2004.5452 |
| OpenAlex | W2008525993 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 4 |
Alain Karsenty, Robert Nasi — A commentary on the article of E. Niesten and R. Rice : Do the « conservation concessions » toll the bells of sustainable forest management ? Conservation concessions, as advocated by E. Niesten and R. Rice, suggest the paying revenues to populations and the State so that they may renounce income derived from forest exploitation. Apart from the questionable transformation of peasants as renters of conservation, serious questions arise as regards the assessment of financial compensation ; the hypothesis of repurchase of traditional rights through contracts is barely realistic. Similarly, the argumentation with regard to sustainable management or the underlying economic pattern is not fault- free. In the event that environmental concessions do not constitute a global alternative to logging, the conditions of their use as complementary instruments to already existing ones remains to be defined
Business · Economics · Economy · Forest management · Geography · Logging · Natural resource economics · Political science · Revenue · Sustainability · Sustainable forest management · Sustainable Management · Welfare economics · Agriculture and Rural Development Research · French Urban and Social Studies · Ecology · Finance · Forestry
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2004 - 2006 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |