Colonising concepts of the good citizen, law's deceptions, and the treaty of Waitangi

The dominant story of the founding of New Zealand is a simple one of cession of sovereignty by the indigenous Maori people to the British in the Treaty of Waitangi 1840. One notable aspect of the dominant legal portrayals of the Treaty signing, and subsequent legal cases, is their repression of the glaring discrepancies between the Maori version of the Treaty, signed by most Maori leaders, and the English versions. Historical arguments suggest that this discrepancy is the result ofdeliberate deceptio.n on the part of British missionaries translating the Treaty into Maori (Walker 1990: 9L Walker 1989: 269, Ross 1972: 20, Ross 1972 NZ]H: 140-141). I argue that this act ofdeception was necessary to the colonisation of New Zealand, and to the formation of New Zealand as a unified nation-state. The deceptive, or 'appropriative' mistranslation (Constable 1996: 634635), of the Treatywas the performance of an ideal of the forwardgazing (white, male) citizen who has successfully shed his history (Davidson 1997: 19, Bernal 1994: 125-127); it served both the individual interests of the citizen/subject translator and the interests of nation-building

Political science · Sociology · Treaty · Treaty of Waitangi · Communism, Protests, Social Movements · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law

• Shaping the Modern Nation

  Open Access•Nan Seuffert•Law/text/culture•2003

  Add to list

• Nation as Partnership

  Open Access•Nan Seuffert•Law & Society Review•2005

  Add to list

• What Should Historians do with Masculinity? Reflections on Nineteenth-century Britain

  Jemma Tosh, John Tosh•History Workshop Journal•1994

  Add to list